Elawyers Elawyers
Ohio| Change

TruServ Corp v. NLRB, 00-1356 (2001)

Court: Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit Number: 00-1356 Visitors: 18
Filed: Aug. 21, 2001
Latest Update: Feb. 22, 2020
Summary: United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit No. 00-1356 September Term, 2000 TruServ Corporation, f/k/a Cotter & Company, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board, Filed On: August 17, 2001 [618389] Respondent Teamsters Local Union No. 293, Intervenor On the Joint Petition for Rehearing by TruServ Corporation and the National Labor Relations Board Before: Edwards, Rogers and Garland, Circuit Judges. O R D E R Upon consideration of the joint petition for rehearing, it
More
United States Court of Appeals for the district of columbia circuit No. 00-1356 September Term, 2000 TruServ Corporation, f/k/a Cotter & Company, Petitioner v. National Labor Relations Board, Filed On: August 17, 2001 [618389] Respondent Teamsters Local Union No. 293, Intervenor On the Joint Petition for Rehearing by TruServ Corporation and the National Labor Relations Board Before: Edwards, Rogers and Garland, Circuit Judges. O R D E R Upon consideration of the joint petition for rehearing, it is ORDERED that the joint petition for rehearing be granted. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the court's opinion filed on July 6, 2001 be amended as follows: Page 2: Strike the final sentence on this page ("Because, however . . . to the Board."). Page 17: Insert a new footnote at the end of the final sen- tence on this page. The new footnote is to read: Because we reverse the Board's finding that TruServe unlawfully implemented its Final Offer, including the TruServ health insurance plan option for employees, there is no occasion to address TruServe's contention that the Board's remedial order should be modified to provide that TruServ would owe no contribu- tions to the Union's Welfare Fund for employees who had opted into the TruServe plan, or, alternatively, would receive a set off against claims it had paid for such employees. Pages 19-20: Delete the last full paragraph beginning on page 19 and ending on page 20 ("Finally, the Company maintains that the Board's remedial order . . . (2d Cir. 1991)."). Page 20: Revise the last sentence of the opinion to read: "Accordingly, we grant the petition in part and deny the petition in part." FOR THE COURT: Mark J. Langer, Clerk BY: Nancy G. Dunn Deputy Clerk
Source:  CourtListener

Can't find what you're looking for?

Post a free question on our public forum.
Ask a Question
Search for lawyers by practice areas.
Find a Lawyer